Why an API Portal is Better Than Straight Client-to-Microservice Interaction


API Portal Representation 1 1

In a microservices architecture, client applications commonly require to take in capability from multiple microservices. If the customer communicates with these services directly, it needs to take care of several calls to different microservice endpoints.

But what occurs when your application progresses– when brand-new solutions are introduced, or existing ones are updated? As the variety of microservices grows, managing all those endpoints from the customer side promptly comes to be complicated. Considering that the client is securely coupled to internal endpoints, any type of modification in the solutions can have a high impact on customer applications, requiring frequent updates and making the system harder to preserve.

This is where an API Entrance is available in. Acting as an intermediate tier, the portal gives a solitary entry factor for clients, streamlining communication and protecting them from the intricacy of the microservice landscape. Without an API Entrance, direct client-to-service communication introduces numerous obstacles:

1 Coupling

Without an entrance, customer applications are securely bound to interior microservices. Any kind of refactoring, endpoint change, or restructuring in those services straight impacts the customer. This develops a vulnerable system where customers have to be updated often …

Source web link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *